Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States, is facing unprecedented jeopardy with the American legal system. Standing trial for both civil and criminal cases in the states of Georgia, New York, and Florida, former President Trump has been prosecuted more than any other former President in the history of the United States, including even John Tyler, the 10th President, who served as a provisional legislator for the Confederate States after his time in the White House.
Prosecution on such a grand scale, especially of an immediate past President by a Democratic White House and Attorney General so close to the 2024 election in November, should raise serious concerns. The justice system’s impartiality must surely be questioned when considering the liberal U.S. and New York Attorney Generals, the Biden DOJ Special Counsel’s handling of the case in Florida, and the Democratic District Attorney in Fulton County, Georgia. Counselors with such close ties to the political archnemesis of any prominent politician, let alone the immediate ex-President, should have no place in the trial courtroom.
Contrary to usual precedent which sees federal judges siding with government lawyers from the prosecution, we are beginning to see the judges in Georgia and Florida push back on the nonsense of these Biden puppets. In Georgia, after it was revealed that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis had a relationship with prosecution leader Nathan Wade, a clear conflict of interest, Judge Scott McAfee offered Willis the choice of either withdrawing from the case, or removing her boyfriend. Now, as Wade is being accused of contempt of court, observers across the country have begun to question Willis’ competence and true motives for prosecuting the former President. And they are right to question Willis, whose sole motives since assuming office were to bring former President Trump to justice. How can a district attorney who is also a registered Democrat with such a glaring conflict of interest be allowed to prosecute such a vital case in our nation’s history against a staunchly Republican former President and GOP presumptive nominee? This is the question that we should all be asking ourselves when considering the events in Georgia.
In Florida, we can see a similar theme in the courtroom of Judge Aileen Cannon, where Special Counsel Jack Smith is occupying his waking hours by prosecuting former President Trump in the Mar-A-Lago classified documents case. Trouble is brewing between the two, with Smith and Cannon arguing back and forth over the timing of the trial, which Smith claims benefits former President Trump’s campaign. This has resulted in a tense, and at times, vicious, crusade by the prosecution to recuse Judge Cannon from the bench, due to her “...odd and sometimes inexplicable decisions,” (Cheney and Gerstein). Special Counsel Smith, a Democratic appointee, has no place prosecuting one of the most important trials in American history.
In all three cases against Trump, the prosecution has been composed of either registered Democratic legal officials or appointees: New York State Attorney General Letitia James, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, and Biden’s Department of Justice appointee Jack Smith. There has been unprecedented scrutiny on the former President, with many liberals rallying to celebrate the US legal system holding a former President accountable for his crimes. However, few on the left are examining the potential corruption that led to the installation of the entire prosecution.
Furthermore, there is an interesting dynamic occurring on the benches of these unprecedented trials. Excluding the decidedly liberal New York City judges, Judges Scott McAfee and Aileen Cannon from Georgia and Florida, respectively, both seem to share a loathing hatred for the prosecutors in the Trump case. Commonly attributed to their supposed “conservative bias”, these judges simply share a profound abhorrence for the weaponized DOJ under President Biden.
Never in the history of the United States has a former President been prosecuted so heavily, not even the traitorous John Tyler, who later legislated for the Confederacy. Never has a former President been prosecuted in a witch hunt so expansive, yet so close to the next election. Nearing the end of then-President Trump’s term, critics opposed his appointment of a Supreme Court Justice to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg so close to the 2020 election, due to a belief that the upcoming election would represent the peoples’ voices by allowing them to choose a President to fill the vacancy. That same voice of the people that the left wing of the political spectrum advocated for is now gone in the name of prosecuting a “corrupt former President”. True hypocrisy has never been demonstrated more clearly.
Right now, as Joe Biden frantically scrambles to shove former President Trump into a jail cell, half of the American population has opted to rely on the words of an embattled radical Democratic New York Attorney General, whose latest battle with the former President is, “...just the latest joust with a powerful foe,” (Izaguirre). The American people are endorsing the faulty prosecution of former President Trump by a Georgia district attorney who hid the facts about her relationship to manipulate the public and alter the course of the trial, and a Biden puppet Special Counsel whose name was largely unknown before this latest publicity stunt.
This is not a conspiracy theory. This is the truth behind the court cases around former President Donald Trump. One day, the nation will awaken from its slumber to connect the dots and see it for what it truly is: America’s Biggest Sham.
Sources
Very insightful article, Ethan. I look forward to seeing more from you soon.
Great job, Ethan! As always, looking forward to your next article!